One is an established respected painter who received royal attention and commissions. The other, an upstart, whose work offends far more than it sells. The Judgment of Paris opens during the pivotal artistic year 1863. There was such an outcry at the quality of the works refused at that year's Paris Salon that these works were displayed in a special exhibit : Salon des Refusés. The story ends the year of the first Impressionist exhibition, 1874.
At the Paris Salon artists were grouped together via last name: Manet and Meisonnier occupied the same room. The latter's work was always well-received given his great attention to detail and his patriotic renditions of Napoleon. Manet had trouble selling his works. Meissonier's work attracted bidding wars. During this decade the government of Napoleon III would fall after an ill-advised war with Germany which the French lost. In the meantime the jury election process for the Salon would undergo constant reworking to appease the critics while keeping tight control so the 'right' art was put on display and the rest suffering the indignity of a red "R" stamped on the back of their canvas. Courbet makes an appearance for constantly being rejected, and then as his popularity shifts, Meissonier misreads it and goes out of his way to keep the man from the Salon.
King's research is meticulous. The amount of information is staggering as the narrative moves forward through all of the paint and petty jealousies among the artists. Yet, despite their personal feelings of the government's treatment of their creativity, when war came many fought for the glory of France. As the country altered so too did it's artistic tastes. Not that the story really ends with the first Impressionist exhibit, after all the movement was named in jest for Monet's Impression Sunrise.
|
Front Cover Image :
© 2006 International Art Treasures Web Magazine, All Rights Reserved. |